Update graphql 2.0.24 → 2.0.26 (patch) #259
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![depfu[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/715?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Codecov ReportPatch and project coverage have no change.
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #259 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 45 45
Lines 616 616
=========================================
Hits 616 616 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Closed in favor of #270. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.
What changed?
✳️ graphql (2.0.24 → 2.0.26) · Repo · Changelog
Release Notes
2.0.26 (from changelog)
2.0.25 (from changelog)
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 38 commits:
2.0.26Merge pull request #4579 from rmosolgo/fix-block-argClarify reference in testFix mixing datadog with other platform traceFix DataDogTrace LocalJumpError2.0.25Merge pull request #4571 from rmosolgo/build-out-trace-modesupdate specsAdd specs for trace mode inheritanceTracing API improvementsMerge pull request #4570 from pocke/patch-1Try fixing system testsMerge pull request #4569 from rmosolgo/dataloader-source-keyDocument an alternative usageFix typo of pull request number in CHANGELOG.mdUpdate run_isolated usage of Source#pending_keysFix typoMerge pull request #4567 from mjfaga/mfaga-fix-typoAdd Source#result_key_forfix: typo in pundit resolver authorization exampleMerge pull request #4559 from Kaytal/patch-2cparser-1.0.5Merge pull request #4558 from rmosolgo/fix-clexer-intUpdate extensions.mdUpdate test for spec complianceFix CParser to handle integers with leading zerosDocument running the cparser testsAdd tests for .visit_methodMerge pull request #4548 from rmosolgo/document-cparserDocument GraphQL::CParserMerge pull request #4543 from rmosolgo/fix-multiple-trace-platformsFix running multiple platform traces at onceMerge pull request #4541 from RicardoTrindade/patch-1Update context_spec.rbMerge pull request #4536 from indyarocks/masterMerge pull request #4539 from swrobel/patch-1Remove mention of graphql-libgraphqlparserdoc: Updated mutation delete/update documentationDepfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
@depfu rebase.All Depfu comment commands